UFOs

Edward Condon is a scientist that believes that UFOs do not exist. In Condon’s argument, he states that scientist need invest their time into studies that will advance science unless people have good ideas regarding UFOs and they should keep pursuing. If people have good ideas for specific studies in the “UFO field” then it should be supported and hopefully it goes well. At the same time, UFO reports should not be available for the general public. For example, students read books and magazines that contain UFO reports which are providing students with erroneous evidence. The other scientist, Hynek, believes the UFO phenomena is ignored by authorities and have not been studied in a systematic manner. There needs to be more gathering of data. There needs to be a comparison among large groups who have supposedly sighted UFO objects. Scientists should contact people in other countries to figure out who seen it other than America. Hynek feels that there could be alien space crafts but there needs to be more research. The third scientist, Royston Paynter, is very skeptical about the UFOs and aliens and that there needs to be physical evidence. He states that there is literally no physical evidence to show UFOS exist. I think that Hynek provides the best argument because he shows how there needs to be more gathering of data from other countries and not only in America. Scientists need to gather all the data and compare groups of those who sighted potential alien crafts.